On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Richard Lowe <richl...@richlowe.net> wrote:
> Cyril Plisko <cyril.pli...@mountall.com> writes:
>
>> Hi !
>>
>> I've recently spent some time adding git support to webrev and it
>> works reasonably well [1].
>> I am interested in committing these changes upstream. I am also
>> willing to maintain git support in the future if the changes would be
>> accepted.
>> Would there be any objections ? If not, what would be the best way to
>> proceed ? Is it enough to file an RFE or ARC review would be required ?
>
> I'd really like us to be cautious about piling in tools support for
> whichever SCM people happen to like best at any given time, since,
> eventually, that would mean "all of them".

I understand your concern, - that's why I asked whether there any objections.
I personally want git support in, but if majority of the people would
not like it - so be it.

> Even with someone to maintain and otherwise improve it, anyone making
> changes has to test with all the applicable systems, this would be the
> 4th in the case of webrev (and nightly? I see it changed, but didn't
> look at how.)

Right, valid point. That's why I wanted to discuss it here before even
filing RFE.
BTW, changes to nightly are really tiny and straightforward. And yes,
they are complimentary to webrev and not mandatory.

> It's also worth pointing out that some of us said "No" when Roland was
> attempting to expand support for Subversion, for pretty much the reasons
> mentioned above:
>
>   http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/tools-discuss/2009-June/004693.html
>

Yes, I remember that too well. I am also impacted directly by Roland'
use of subversion :)

> Webrev is somewhat of a special case here, in that it's used by a much
> wider number of projects (hence subversion support, for the CCD), but
> I'm not sure how special.
>
> I'm not sure I care strongly enough to argue about it or anything, but
> it's worth considering.
>
>> [1] http://cr.opensolaris.org/~imp/git_support.3
>
> Specific comments:

I will go throw these later in a separate mail.

-- 
Regards,
        Cyril
_______________________________________________
tools-discuss mailing list
tools-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to