On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Peter Memishian wrote:
> meem> Just the return address? Or would this also be the From address? > > Oops, bad wording on my part. This would also be the From address. The > changeset author would still be visible in the body of the message. While it's not a huge deal, with the current model I can quickly find pushes that are likely to be of interest to me (e.g., from engineers in my group) from the summary view of a given inbox. Further, I can send the person doing the push (usually the same as the author) a comment related to their push (e.g., "did you see this related CR?" or whatever) with a simple "reply" rather than having to dig into the body of the message for that information. So at least for me, the current model is useful, but perhaps I'm the only one.
I like the current model for the same reason, but I notice that those people who are external already get the From address rewritten.
Valerie -- Valerie Fenwick, http://blogs.sun.com/bubbva/ @bubbva Solaris Security Technologies, Developer, Sun Microsystems, Inc. 17 Network Circle, Menlo Park, CA, 94025. _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
