On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Valerie Bubb Fenwick wrote:
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Peter Memishian wrote:
> meem> Just the return address? Or would this also be the From address?
>
> Oops, bad wording on my part. This would also be the From address. The
> changeset author would still be visible in the body of the message.
While it's not a huge deal, with the current model I can quickly find
pushes that are likely to be of interest to me (e.g., from engineers in my
group) from the summary view of a given inbox. Further, I can send the
person doing the push (usually the same as the author) a comment related
to their push (e.g., "did you see this related CR?" or whatever) with a
simple "reply" rather than having to dig into the body of the message for
that information. So at least for me, the current model is useful, but
perhaps I'm the only one.
I like the current model for the same reason, but I notice that those people
who are external already get the From address rewritten.
Talking to Rich Lowe on IRC I realize that the emails Kupfer is talking
about and the ones I'm thinking about are different. I don't see the emails
Kupfer is talking about modifying, in which case, I don't care :)
Valerie
--
Valerie Fenwick, http://blogs.sun.com/bubbva/ @bubbva
Solaris Security Technologies, Developer, Sun Microsystems, Inc.
17 Network Circle, Menlo Park, CA, 94025.
_______________________________________________
tools-discuss mailing list
tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
