On 01/16/2012 01:39 PM, K. Peachey wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Tim Landscheidt <[email protected]> > wrote: >> We could also move the pressure: Labs' bot running infra- >> structure doesn't seem to be /that/ far from opening. If >> interwiki bots were running there, it would allow the foun- >> dation to judge whether pushing for the deployment of Inter- >> Language isn't worth it in the end. > Labs isn't a fix all solution for situations like these, Since the > issue is interwiki,py has memory management problems amongst others > apparently I would be guessing ryan would be hesitant to have it > running that labs platform even though labs is designed to do more > more "virtual containers" than a shared system like how the toolserver > operates unless those issues were resolved.
Since "is this something labs could do?" has come up, please feel free to add features and functionality you'd like in Labs at https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Labs/Toolserver_features_wanted -- Sumana Harihareswara Volunteer Development Coordinator Wikimedia Foundation _______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list ([email protected]) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
