Hi Scott, some more details...(for error1) The actually originating code is:
<rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bimtoolset.org/ontologies/pmo-lite.owl";> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology"/> <rdfs:comment rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string";>Toplevel Product Modelling Ontology by SWOP</rdfs:comment> <owl:imports rdf:resource="http://spinrdf.org/spin"/> </rdf:Description> After the export/merge we have in: <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.bimtoolset.org/ontologies/pmo-lite.owl";> <rdfs:comment rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string";>Toplevel Product Modelling Ontology by SWOP</rdfs:comment> </rdf:Description> So the: <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology"/> Is gone....! The only thing there is: <rdf:Description rdf:about=""> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Ontology"/> </rdf:Description> Ie an empty string...if "http://www.bimtoolset.org/ontologies/pmo-lite.owl"; would have been there the error should go... I think this is in some way incorrect? Ch/Michel -----Original Message----- From: Scott Henninger [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: woensdag 2 december 2009 15:31 To: TopBraid Composer Users Subject: [tbc-users] Re: untypes resources Michel; The warnings are not critical - they are just stating that the resources do not have a type triple, which is often valid for RDF data. In this case, it appears that import statements are missing for the three resources. This probably occurred during the merges and was either a matter of not including the imports or not filtering out some unnecessary triples. Looking at your data, I suspect it is the latter of the two. To reveal how these resources are used, I'd suggest using some SPARQL queries. For example: SELECT * WHERE { <http://www.bimtoolset.org/ontologies/pmo-lite.owl> ?p ? object . } reveals a comment statement. The other untyped resources have similar annotation data. -- Scott On Dec 2, 4:52 am, "Bohms, H.M. (Michel)" <[email protected]> wrote: > I get three errors of untyped resources that I don't understand. > As far as I can see all is in there (its an exported/merged total ontology > (from TBC 3.2.1) based on many small ontologies). > Anybody an idea? > > thx a lot, Michel > > a technical issue > - I exported/merged as RDF/XML Abbreviated. Howver the generated code > more looks like just RDF/XM (ie non-abbreviated) > > TNO.NL > > Michel Böhms > > Consultant Building Innovation > > TNO Built Environment and Geosciences > > Van Mourik Broekmanweg 6 | PO Box 49 > > 2600 AA | Delft | The Netherlands > > Tel +31 15 2763107 > > E-mail [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > Webhttp://www.linkedin.com/in/michelbohms<http://www.linkedin.com/in/m > ichelbohms> > > Skype name michelbohms > > Disclaimer > <blocked::http://www.tno.nl/content.cfm?&context=overtno&content=overt > nosub&laa...> > > This e-mail and its contents are subject to the DISCLAIMER > athttp://www.tno.nl/disclaimer/email.html > > IntUBE-EnergyBIMv2.owl > 1417KViewDownload -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Composer Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=en. This e-mail and its contents are subject to the DISCLAIMER at http://www.tno.nl/disclaimer/email.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Composer Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=en.
