Ok, any pros for the new approach (compared to just owl-rdfs/shacl split) very welcome, Gr Michel
Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms Senior Data Scientist T +31888663107 M +31630381220 E [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Location<https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88!8m2!3d52.000788!4d4.376707> [cid:[email protected]]<http://www.tno.nl/> This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Holger Knublauch Sent: woensdag 4 oktober 2017 09:02 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] owl-shacl question Sure, that should work without problems. The suggested split is mostly for new projects that are under your control. Holger Sent from my iPad On 4 Oct 2017, at 16:49, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Dear Irene, Holger In http://spinrdf.org/shacl-and-owl.html it is suggested to have the following ‘architecture’: <image002.png> Would I lose much benefit when I simplify a bit by just having OWL/RDFS (with owl/rdfs owa inferencing) on top and (several) SHACL views (with shacl cwa validation and inferencing (rule part)) below. (I just mention ‘several’because typically there are more validation-views possible working on the same conceptual owl-view). Just looking for pros and cons. One of the reasons is that in practically all existing ontologies relevant for us do not have the split yet in rdfs and owl…just an example: a very recent proposal that I really like: https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/, is in OWL-DL. I want to directly reuse and pref. not split first in a RDFS part and an OWL-DL part. Thx for your advice here, Michel Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms Senior Data Scientist T +31888663107 M +31630381220 E [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Location<https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88!8m2!3d52.000788!4d4.376707> <image003.gif><http://www.tno.nl/> This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
