The pros are that users that don't want/need to use OWL don't have to
import these axioms, and thus the RDF files that you are producing are
more focused - think of separation of concerns, which is generally a
good engineering practice. SHACL doesn't need OWL, OWL doesn't need
SHACL, so there is no reason to stack them on top of each other. If
projects plan ahead they can also more easily retire any part of their
stack that is no longer needed. Finally, having OWL axioms around may
create false expectations or confuse the view point from a SHACL
perspective (although the axioms are technically ignored, users may
expect inferencing to happen).
Holger
On 4/10/2017 17:28, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) wrote:
Ok, any pros for the new approach (compared to just owl-rdfs/shacl
split) very welcome,
Gr Michel
Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms
Senior Data Scientist
T +31888663107
M +31630381220
E [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Location
<https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=%213m1%214b1%214m5%213m4%211s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88%218m2%213d52.000788%214d4.376707>
<http://www.tno.nl/>
This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If
you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by
mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the
message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail, for
the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind resulting
from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission of messages.
*From:*[email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Holger Knublauch
*Sent:* woensdag 4 oktober 2017 09:02
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [topbraid-users] owl-shacl question
Sure, that should work without problems. The suggested split is mostly
for new projects that are under your control.
Holger
Sent from my iPad
On 4 Oct 2017, at 16:49, Bohms, H.M. (Michel) <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Dear Irene, Holger
In http://spinrdf.org/shacl-and-owl.html it is suggested to have
the following ‘architecture’:
<image002.png>
Would I lose much benefit when I simplify a bit by just having
OWL/RDFS (with owl/rdfs owa inferencing) on top and (several)
SHACL views (with shacl cwa validation and inferencing (rule
part)) below. (I just mention ‘several’because typically there are
more validation-views possible working on the same conceptual
owl-view). Just looking for pros and cons. One of the reasons is
that in practically all existing ontologies relevant for us do not
have the split yet in rdfs and owl…just an example: a very recent
proposal that I really like: https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/, is
in OWL-DL. I want to directly reuse and pref. not split first in a
RDFS part and an OWL-DL part.
Thx for your advice here,
Michel
Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms
Senior Data Scientist
T +31888663107
M +31630381220
E [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Location
<https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=%213m1%214b1%214m5%213m4%211s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88%218m2%213d52.000788%214d4.376707>
<image003.gif> <http://www.tno.nl/>
This message may contain information that is not intended for you.
If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by
mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the
message. TNO accepts no liability for the content of this e-mail,
for the manner in which you use it and for damage of any kind
resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic transmission
of messages.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid
Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
