All clear, thx a lot David!




Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms
Senior Data Scientist


T +31888663107
M +31630381220
E michel.bo...@tno.nl<mailto:michel.bo...@tno.nl>

Location<https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88!8m2!3d52.000788!4d4.376707>



[cid:image001.gif@01D4FF5D.D69C83D0]<http://www.tno.nl/>

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are 
not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are 
requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability 
for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for 
damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic 
transmission of messages.









From: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com <topbraid-users@googlegroups.com> On 
Behalf Of dprice
Sent: dinsdag 30 april 2019 13:39
To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com
Cc: Lars Wikstrom <lars.wikst...@triona.se>
Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] singleton




On 30 Apr 2019, at 12:18, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users 
<topbraid-users@googlegroups.com<mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote:

Hi David,
Req comes from the modelling of ‘one data delivery from one party to another’ 
using a ‘container’.
Ontology defines meta data for container. One things is that there can be only 
one instance for the Container class.

Solution now is to subclass owl:Ontology....something I found curious and 
wanted to change....hence my question.....

Think we better leave out the explicit restriction…

There are many things OWL cannot state. Recommend write the constraint in the 
definition of the class, and perhaps add the ASK query someone could run to 
validate the data in a note or example associated with the class.

FWIW cannot see how subclassing owl:Ontology possibly helps with this 
requirement if you’re still left with OWL as the language. I certainly would 
not recommend doing something “curious” to work around constraints that cannot 
be stated in OWL. Just use SPARQL ASK or SHACL on top of the OWL and you’re 
done.

Cheers,
David



Thx Michel





Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms
Senior Data Scientist



T +31888663107
M +31630381220
E michel.bo...@tno.nl<mailto:michel.bo...@tno.nl>

Location<https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88!8m2!3d52.000788!4d4.376707>



<image001.gif><http://www.tno.nl/>

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are 
not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are 
requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability 
for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for 
damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic 
transmission of messages.









From: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com<mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com> 
<topbraid-users@googlegroups.com<mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> On 
Behalf Of dprice
Sent: dinsdag 30 april 2019 13:13
To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com<mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] singleton


On 30 Apr 2019, at 11:52, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users 
<topbraid-users@googlegroups.com<mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote:

Hmmm, the one instance is not static, but changing...
(so I was looking for a certain restriction on class level like “can contain 
max 1 instance”).

Curious requirement, but OK.

Easiest answer is to use a bit of SHACL or run a simple ASK query on the data 
graph to validate this requirement.



Guess not inline with open world assumption anyway…?

OWL almost supports doing what you want, only not with changing instance over 
time - more of a build-time capability. If you read the W3C spec it even talks 
about reasoners inferring sameAs if you’re not careful with enumerated classes.

Cheers,
David









Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms
Senior Data Scientist




T +31888663107
M +31630381220
E michel.bo...@tno.nl<mailto:michel.bo...@tno.nl>

Location<https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88!8m2!3d52.000788!4d4.376707>



<image001.gif><http://www.tno.nl/>

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are 
not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are 
requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability 
for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for 
damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic 
transmission of messages.









From: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com<mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com> 
<topbraid-users@googlegroups.com<mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> On 
Behalf Of dprice
Sent: dinsdag 30 april 2019 12:36
To: topbraid-users@googlegroups.com<mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [topbraid-users] singleton






On 30 Apr 2019, at 09:44, 'Bohms, H.M. (Michel)' via TopBraid Suite Users 
<topbraid-users@googlegroups.com<mailto:topbraid-users@googlegroups.com>> wrote:

I there anyway to restrict a class to one instance in OWL?

Make an enumerated class with only one individual that is of type the class. 
See https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#Enumeration_of_Individuals

Note that you can create the class in one graph, and enumerate the individuals 
in a second if you need to partition instances from classes and/or allow for 
different individuals in different contexts.

Cheers,
David




(ie singleton)

Thx Michel





Dr. ir. H.M. (Michel) Böhms
Senior Data Scientist





T +31888663107
M +31630381220
E michel.bo...@tno.nl<mailto:michel.bo...@tno.nl>

Location<https://www.google.com/maps/place/TNO+-+Locatie+Delft+-+Stieltjesweg/@52.000788,4.3745183,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x47c5b58c52869997:0x56681566be3b8c88!8m2!3d52.000788!4d4.376707>



<image001.gif><http://www.tno.nl/>

This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are 
not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are 
requested to inform the sender and delete the message. TNO accepts no liability 
for the content of this e-mail, for the manner in which you use it and for 
damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent to the electronic 
transmission of messages.










--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

UK +44 (0) 7788 561308
US +1 (336) 283-0808

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

UK +44 (0) 7788 561308
US +1 (336) 283-0808

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

UK +44 (0) 7788 561308
US +1 (336) 283-0808

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to