On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Steve Borho <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:46 AM, TK Soh <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Technically, it rename/move dialog should be a full-blown file chooser >> dialog, as files can be moved/renamed to another directory. The Status >> window handle move and rename separately, so we can live with a simple >> rename dialog. But hgtk mv might be a better one. > > Optimally, we would support moves in the shell extension. A right-drag into > a folder would pop up a context menu with options: 'revisioned move', > 'revisioned copy' > > In practice, I expect most Windows users to just move and rename their files > willy-nilly and then expect Mercurial to figure out what happened at commit > time. That's where my idea of a 'find renames' dialog would be useful.
My idea I've had for a long time is to implement the copy extension for copy/move/rename, which should be more 'natural' for Window users. But I have never found the time look at it though. > This simple rename dialog is just to make it _nearly_ as easy to rename a > file in a way that Mercurial is immediately aware of (we'll even update the > overlays). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop
