On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:12 AM, TK Soh <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Steve Borho <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:46 AM, TK Soh <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Technically, it rename/move dialog should be a full-blown file chooser >>> dialog, as files can be moved/renamed to another directory. The Status >>> window handle move and rename separately, so we can live with a simple >>> rename dialog. But hgtk mv might be a better one. >> >> Optimally, we would support moves in the shell extension. A right-drag into >> a folder would pop up a context menu with options: 'revisioned move', >> 'revisioned copy' >> >> In practice, I expect most Windows users to just move and rename their files >> willy-nilly and then expect Mercurial to figure out what happened at commit >> time. That's where my idea of a 'find renames' dialog would be useful. > > My idea I've had for a long time is to implement the copy extension > for copy/move/rename, which should be more 'natural' for Window users. > But I have never found the time look at it though.
BTW, I was referring to explorer shell extension. >> This simple rename dialog is just to make it _nearly_ as easy to rename a >> file in a way that Mercurial is immediately aware of (we'll even update the >> overlays). > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Tortoisehg-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tortoisehg-develop
