gw43 wrote: > What wasn't great was the (sadly frequent) times when I had to spend > 20-30 minutes fannying* about with the software to get it working. What > wasn't great was on my wife's days off her calling me at work to say she > couldn't get internet radio working. > <snip> > Sophisticated devices - in my experience, the more sophisticated a > device, the easier/better the user experience. I have had a couple of > decades working in manufacturing, some of it in hi-tech. Make it work, > make it work well, then make it cheap! Slim Devices, and then Logitech > had barely got beyond the first stage. > <snip> > I do not need to try and impress upon them my "technology savvy" chops > by having to dick about with the bloody Squeezebox Touch every third > track 'cos it's dropped the connection. > <snip> > I'm glad to be moving away from a community that, on the basis of your > post, seems to promote complexity over simplicity, makes a virtue of > things being "difficult", and mocks well thought out solutions to > problems. It's too bad your SB experience was such a hassle, but it's really wrong to extrapolate your personal difficulties in dealing with the system to it being too complex to work. For me, and for many, SB "just works".
If your Touch was constantly dropping the connection that sounds like a fault with your wifi network, which is no fault of Logitech or Slim Devices. In that situation, you could fix your network, or you could buy a new one, which is effectively what you did with Sonos. It sounds like you've found a match. Goodbye. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ aubuti's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2074 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=100758 _______________________________________________ Touch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
