On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Brett Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > RFTS is still a bit of a moving target and writing an AI you need >> > all the peculiarities of the specific implementation. I believe >> > this is where vi1985's questions come from (as he is doing an AI >> > for RFTS :). >> > >> >> That is correct :). I was hoping it would be a stationary target, >> though ;) > > You are thinking backwards... being a moving target means problems aren't set > in stone, so you can get them fixed or fix them yourself. Plus `correct' for > the server can be defined by what your AI needs. So it gives you more > options. >
Ok, I agree with you, although of course it makes for more work, and delays the process a bit (speaking about deadlines ;). > nash > -- Victor. Truth is greater than ten goats (Nigerian proverb). _______________________________________________ tp-devel mailing list [email protected] http://www.thousandparsec.net/tp/mailman.php/listinfo/tp-devel
