> > RFTS is still a bit of a moving target and writing an AI you need
> > all the peculiarities of the specific implementation. I believe
> > this is where vi1985's questions come from (as he is doing an AI
> > for RFTS :).
> >
>
> That is correct :). I was hoping it would be a stationary target,
> though ;)
You are thinking backwards... being a moving target means problems aren't set
in stone, so you can get them fixed or fix them yourself. Plus `correct' for
the server can be defined by what your AI needs. So it gives you more
options.
nash
_______________________________________________
tp-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.thousandparsec.net/tp/mailman.php/listinfo/tp-devel
