Alec Thomas wrote: > On 4/25/07, Emmanuel Blot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> That said, there is an issue with this approach: Trac is now widely >> used in OSS, and as a Trac user I would not like having to guess >> whether a Trac installation is wiki-enabled or not whenever I fill in >> a new ticket on another Trac site... >> Enabling too many configuration settings (not mentioning the setup >> nightmare and potential support nightmare...) would also confuse the >> end user who is used to Trac. >> > > I agree 100%. Trac can not be all things to all people, sometimes we > just have to say "no, this is intended behaviour". Making every aspect > of Trac configurable will just bloat the codebase, which it's already > tending towards :( > > And if they are really insistent, they can always make a plugin.
--Noah
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
