Christian, I couldn't agree more on what you wrote. That's exactly my point.
Noah's wrote: > That kind of huge collection of features might > be good for boxing up and shipping to people that want a turnkey > solution, but they aren't much use in the Trac community So anyone who want to have usable Trac flavour needs to make his hand dirty and be ready for using hacks everywhere... Noah's statement is one of the most ridiculous I've ever read. Noah, usually people have to deal with a bunch of different systems and have many problems to solve. It's naturally that the best approach here is to limit the effort which is needed for maintenance of a single tool. Why somebody should give a f*** on a tool who increases amount of job that needs to be done? When I read this I'm starting to perceive that Trac is now in the wrong hands. Noah, please. Grow up. Cboos, I wish you all good with the new project, but duplicating effort to bring a good tool (as I perceived Trac until recenty) is a dramatic waste of time. Maybe it's just a problem with management of Trac as a software product. Democracy is not always the best thing in such situations :) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
