Samuel A. Falvo II wrote: > On 6/25/07, Omry Yadan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> this cause trac to depend on javascript, which is a minus if its not >> depends on js right now (does it?). >> > > Why is this a minus? Is one of Trac's requirements to be compatible > with Lynx and w3m? Is it not possible to support both UIs in that > case? I envision something like GMail, where it has "full-featured" > mode, and "basic HTML" mode for browsers that aren't supported. > > I personally don't see what's so wrong about attaching a file to a > ticket and saying, "Please see figure-2.jpg" or some such. But I > digress. > > Its a minus simply because dependencies are bad. if trac already depends on js its not a minus at all. if its not, than loosing support for lynx etc is a bad thing. maybe such a feature is worth more than the negative outcome of loosing support for those browsers - but all I am saying is thats its a point to be taken.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
