Samuel A. Falvo II wrote:
> On 6/25/07, Omry Yadan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> this cause trac to depend on javascript, which is a minus if its not
>> depends on js right now (does it?).
>>     
>
> Why is this a minus?  Is one of Trac's requirements to be compatible
> with Lynx and w3m?  Is it not possible to support both UIs in that
> case?  I envision something like GMail, where it has "full-featured"
> mode, and "basic HTML" mode for browsers that aren't supported.
>   
Yes. We maintain a fairly strict rule that no core functionality
requires JavaScript or CSS. Take the new in place browser system, if you
have JS it is a nice boost to speed and whatnot, but it doesn't present
any no functionality that isn't available other ways.

--Noah


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to