On 20/09/2016 11:09 PM, Mo wrote:
Am Freitag, 1. Juli 2016 09:50:01 UTC+2 schrieb Mo:
I haven't seen a plugin for that, but it has been requested in
this ticket:
https://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/8069
<https://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/8069>
Exactly the same request. Thanks. That was years ago. Any way to
push that a bit?
Generally, tracking different tasks like test and documentation
within one ticket with additional status flags will extent the
ticket size, while adding ticket (blocking) clones for additional
tasks would increase the ticket count. We discussed different pro
and cons. As every feature ticket will consist of the same
quadruple of dev/test/doc and maybe review, and usually they are
all finished very close to the project end, we tend to add flags
to the ticket for these subtasks.
Here is another "con". The above ticket requesting multiple users being
assigned to a single ticket is not necessarily a "Good Idea". The Cc:
list should suffice to include extra team members and the Owned
by/developer should be one person who carries the blame when things go
wrong.
Have you looked at the configurable workflow plugin?
https://www.edgewall.org/docs/tags-trac-1.0/epydoc/trac.ticket.default_workflow.ConfigurableTicketWorkflow-class.html
If you are not already using it, that would formalize the
dev/test/reject|accept default process steps. Being configurable you
could insert or append a review step or anything really. For example,
pre-doc/spec/dev/test/final-doc/reject|accept/review
It would be better IMO to have a separate ticket for the documentation
and let that proceed via the same steps as the code. Docs can have bugs
too. You could then have exactly the same set of steps for both tickets
... being dev/test/reject|accept/review. Obviously you would need some
sort of testing for the docs. Maybe a style-guide, language translations
etc.
Mike
I was adding some ideas about such a plugin here:
https://trac.edgewall.org/ticket/2662#comment:73
I'm not capable of creating a trac plugins yet...
I found some useful part implemented here:
https://trac-hacks.org/ticket/8477
At least it is possible to have autocompletion with users on custom
fields.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Trac Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/trac-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/trac-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
