--- In [email protected], "Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr)" <ldeff...@...> wrote: > > James Ewen wrote: > > > > change is less than the variability due to RF vagaries. Get that > > routine fleshed out, and polished up, and it will be the next best > > thing since SmartBeaconing... (Uh-oh, I'm going to upset Lynn with his > > Genius routine!) > > > > I'm not worried, there's no room in the Tracker2 family to pull this > off. I keep hearing how it's out of code space anyway. > > Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of APRSISCE for Windows Mobile and Win32 > > PS. Check out my GeniusBeaconing description at > http://aprsisce.wikidot.com/red-dot > Interesting problem, though the solution could be as simple as setting a branch condition from ">" to ">=" or limiting the low speed threshold to non-zero values.
- [tracker2] Smart Beaconing anomaly at 0 MPH possi... Chris
- Re: [tracker2] Smart Beaconing anomaly at 0 ... James Ewen
- [tracker2] Re: Smart Beaconing anomaly a... Chris
- Re: [tracker2] Re: Smart Beaconing a... Patrick
- [tracker2] Re: Smart Beaconing a... Chris
- Re: [tracker2] Re: Smart Be... James Ewen
- Re: [tracker2] Re: Smar... Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr)
- [tracker2] Re: Smar... Chris
- [tracker2] Re: Smart Be... Chris
- Re: [tracker2] Smart Beaconing anomaly at 0 ... Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr)
- Re: [tracker2] Smart Beaconing anomaly at 0 ... Bob Poortinga
- Re: [tracker2] Smart Beaconing anomaly a... James Ewen
- [tracker2] Re: Smart Beaconing anoma... Chris
- Re: [tracker2] Re: Smart Beaconi... Keith VE7GDH
- [tracker2] Re: Smart Beacon... Chris
- Re: [tracker2] Re: Smar... Keith VE7GDH
- [tracker2] Re: Smart Beaconing anomaly a... Chris
