> > > You are right. Again, if someone has suggestions for a better label. > > First you select the period (monthly) and then you define / refine > the > > date within that period. > > I could make the label dynamic, so when you select monthly I will > > state 'Select monthly recurrence' or something? > > Maybe that would already be more helpful. Perhaps a bit different > visual organization could also make the link between the periods and > the specific options for that period more clear, but I don't have a > suggestion right now. >
Ok, I'll change the label. Furthermore we can wait a bit to see if there is additional feedback / suggestions from other users. > > > option > > > there: 'the date the todo is completed'. > > > > > > > What do you mean with completed? We are using Due Date in the new- > todo > > Forms. > > Yes, but Due Date is not what I mean. I mean completed (as in, when I > check the checkbox and task is done). Case in point: I want to clean my > coffeemaker every two months. So the recurrence is two months. After > that period I want the task to show up, but I may not get to it for > several weeks. When I'm actually done cleaning it, then I want the next > period of 2 months to start. > This is actually default behavior. The next todo is calculated on the due date. If you didn't make the due date, the completion date is used to calculate the next date. I figured this is more closely to the 'next action' philosophy than fixed date behavior... If needed the fixed date behavior can easily be added though Reinier _______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
