On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 21:00 +0200, Reinier Balt wrote: > Furthermore we can wait a bit to see if there > is additional feedback / suggestions from other users.
Sure, I'm just one voice here. > > Yes, but Due Date is not what I mean. I mean completed (as in, when I > > check the checkbox and task is done). Case in point: I want to clean my > > coffeemaker every two months. So the recurrence is two months. After > > that period I want the task to show up, but I may not get to it for > > several weeks. When I'm actually done cleaning it, then I want the next > > period of 2 months to start. > > > > This is actually default behavior. The next todo is calculated on the due > date. If you didn't make the due date, the completion date is used > to calculate the next date. I figured this is more closely to > the 'next action' philosophy than fixed date behavior... > > If needed the fixed date behavior can easily be added though I tend not to set Due Date's on todo's that don't really need to be done on that date, it will only make me feel guilty when I don't make that date. So if I pick the second option (date todo comes from tickler), will it then schedule the next todo based on the date it comes from the tickler, or based on the completion of the action? Kind regards, Hans
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
