> One of the reasons I am pushing this now, is that I have more spare > time to spend on this project up to August than usual. So, my concern > is to move this forward as much as possible until then. So far, I have > only received feedback on my wiki page from Reinier, and a comment on > #300 from Yoichi. I am not sure how much response can be expected? >
I don't think you should expect much more :-) The comments will probably come when we merge some of your work in master. > One way to go, is that I start a branch and begin implementing a > minimal version of the proposal "as is", and receive your feedback on > that. Mostly to get a better feel for the work flow and GUI issues. > I think that would be the best way to go. Just work of a branch from 1.8devel and rebase to keep current. People could follow your work (I will) and help test it. When it is mature enough we can merge it into master for 1.8 > The help I need in that case would mostly be: testing prototype > versions, code review and RoR expertise. > Don't forget about tests :-) > The question is (mostly to Reinier): Do you think there are still too > many unresolved issues? Do you want more consensus before I start > coding away? > Just start coding away (and have fun), based on the stuff in the wiki page. Perhaps you could consolidate the discussion on the wiki to have a clear direction. Just ask for help on this list or directly. Reinier > > BR > /Henrik > > > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Eric Allen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > This is great news! The background on this is mostly that I was going > to > > take on the project over a year ago, but got bogged down with school > and > > then work and never got around to it. It's been on "the list" for a > while, > > but none of us has been willing to take the plunge. That being said, > I'd be > > happy to help you make this happen! A lot of us want to see some kind > of > > dependency management in Tracks, but the big issue is making it > unobtrusive > > and a positive in light of GTD. > > > > -Eric > > > > On May 14, 2009, at 3:08 PM, Henrik Bohre wrote: > > > >> FYI: I'd like to inform you about some work being done to outline a > >> proposal for adding dependencies between actions. > >> > >> http://www.getontracks.org/wiki/ActionDependencies/ > >> > >> I have taken the liberty to use > >> https://www.assembla.com/spaces/tracks-tickets/tickets/300 for > >> tracking the progress for this feature, and > >> https://www.assembla.com/spaces/tracks-tickets/tickets/903 for > >> tracking a GUI mockup. > >> > >> This is the feature I'd most like to see in future versions of > Tracks, > >> so I urge all interested to hack away at the wiki page and the above > >> tickets to create an excellent implementation proposal. > >> > >> Also, since I am new to the Tracks community I may not have all the > >> background info about what people have done earlier on this feature. > >> So please, let me know if I have missed something. > >> > >> > >> Best regards, > >> /Henrik > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Tracks-discuss mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Tracks-discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > Tracks-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss _______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
