Hi, To make it easier to give feedback, I deployed the demo at http://tracks-deps.heroku.com. (Thanks Gavin for the howto).
Please note that this is at the prototype stage, and for now my main goal is to integrate it with the Tracks/GTD work flow and GUI look and feel, but any feedback is highly appreciated. Login with tester/tester and have fun with it! BR /Henrik On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Henrik Bohre <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Progress report: > > I started a fork on http://wiki.github.com/bohrax/tracks. Perhaps I > should have branched the code also? Being a complete newbie to git, > Ruby and Rails I'd appreciate any feedback and tips on best practices > here. > > Anyway, the code, while still being in an early stage and practically > devoid of error checking now supports the basics for > creating/editing/viewing dependencies as described in #300 and #903. > > If someone would have time to try the code out, or dig into it, it > would be really great. Any feedback appreciated! > > BR > /Henrik > > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Tim Madden <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Henrik, >> >> I could definitely use this functionality. I do not have time now to review >> your wiki page in detail but in my quick scan it looked spot on. I'd be >> happy to test your branch and give you feedback. Let me know the url when >> there is something there! >> Tim >> >> >> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Henrik Bohre <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Reinier, Eric and others! >>> >>> One of the reasons I am pushing this now, is that I have more spare >>> time to spend on this project up to August than usual. So, my concern >>> is to move this forward as much as possible until then. So far, I have >>> only received feedback on my wiki page from Reinier, and a comment on >>> #300 from Yoichi. I am not sure how much response can be expected? >>> >>> One way to go, is that I start a branch and begin implementing a >>> minimal version of the proposal "as is", and receive your feedback on >>> that. Mostly to get a better feel for the work flow and GUI issues. >>> >>> The help I need in that case would mostly be: testing prototype >>> versions, code review and RoR expertise. >>> >>> The question is (mostly to Reinier): Do you think there are still too >>> many unresolved issues? Do you want more consensus before I start >>> coding away? >>> >>> >>> BR >>> /Henrik >>> >>> >>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Eric Allen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > This is great news! The background on this is mostly that I was going to >>> > take on the project over a year ago, but got bogged down with school and >>> > then work and never got around to it. It's been on "the list" for a >>> > while, >>> > but none of us has been willing to take the plunge. That being said, I'd >>> > be >>> > happy to help you make this happen! A lot of us want to see some kind of >>> > dependency management in Tracks, but the big issue is making it >>> > unobtrusive >>> > and a positive in light of GTD. >>> > >>> > -Eric >>> > >>> > On May 14, 2009, at 3:08 PM, Henrik Bohre wrote: >>> > >>> >> FYI: I'd like to inform you about some work being done to outline a >>> >> proposal for adding dependencies between actions. >>> >> >>> >> http://www.getontracks.org/wiki/ActionDependencies/ >>> >> >>> >> I have taken the liberty to use >>> >> https://www.assembla.com/spaces/tracks-tickets/tickets/300 for >>> >> tracking the progress for this feature, and >>> >> https://www.assembla.com/spaces/tracks-tickets/tickets/903 for >>> >> tracking a GUI mockup. >>> >> >>> >> This is the feature I'd most like to see in future versions of Tracks, >>> >> so I urge all interested to hack away at the wiki page and the above >>> >> tickets to create an excellent implementation proposal. >>> >> >>> >> Also, since I am new to the Tracks community I may not have all the >>> >> background info about what people have done earlier on this feature. >>> >> So please, let me know if I have missed something. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Best regards, >>> >> /Henrik >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> Tracks-discuss mailing list >>> >> [email protected] >>> >> http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Tracks-discuss mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tracks-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss >> >> > _______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
