After a quick look (the prototype demo is nice) one thing I could suggest is
a clearer signal of dependency. Maybe have tasks indent under the task they
are dependant on.  For multiple dependancy, have the task appear multiple
times, and change the colour of the status ("Pending") flag.

Might also be nice to be able to drag tasks onto other tasks to create
dependencies.


Nicholas

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Henrik Bohre <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> To make it easier to give feedback, I deployed the demo at
> http://tracks-deps.heroku.com. (Thanks Gavin for the howto).
>
> Please note that this is at the prototype stage, and for now my main
> goal is to integrate it with the Tracks/GTD work flow and GUI look and
> feel, but any feedback is highly appreciated.
>
> Login with tester/tester and have fun with it!
>
> BR
> /Henrik
>
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Henrik Bohre <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Progress report:
> >
> > I started a fork on http://wiki.github.com/bohrax/tracks. Perhaps I
> > should have branched the code also? Being a complete newbie to git,
> > Ruby and Rails I'd appreciate any feedback and tips on best practices
> > here.
> >
> > Anyway, the code, while still being in an early stage and practically
> > devoid of error checking now supports the basics for
> > creating/editing/viewing dependencies as described in #300 and #903.
> >
> > If someone would have time to try the code out, or dig into it, it
> > would be really great. Any feedback appreciated!
> >
> > BR
> > /Henrik
> >
> > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Tim Madden <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> Hi Henrik,
> >>
> >> I could definitely use this functionality.  I do not have time now to
> review
> >> your wiki page in detail but in my quick scan it looked spot on.  I'd be
> >> happy to test your branch and give you feedback.  Let me know the url
> when
> >> there is something there!
> >> Tim
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Henrik Bohre <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Reinier, Eric and others!
> >>>
> >>> One of the reasons I am pushing this now, is that I have more spare
> >>> time to spend on this project up to August than usual. So, my concern
> >>> is to move this forward as much as possible until then. So far, I have
> >>> only received feedback on my wiki page from Reinier, and a comment on
> >>> #300 from Yoichi. I am not sure how much response can be expected?
> >>>
> >>> One way to go, is that I start a branch and begin implementing a
> >>> minimal version of the proposal "as is", and receive your feedback on
> >>> that. Mostly to get a better feel for the work flow and GUI issues.
> >>>
> >>> The help I need in that case would mostly be: testing prototype
> >>> versions, code review and RoR expertise.
> >>>
> >>> The question is (mostly to Reinier): Do you think there are still too
> >>> many unresolved issues? Do you want more consensus before I start
> >>> coding away?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> BR
> >>> /Henrik
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Eric Allen <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>> > This is great news! The background on this is mostly that I was going
> to
> >>> > take on the project over a year ago, but got bogged down with school
> and
> >>> > then work and never got around to it. It's been on "the list" for a
> >>> > while,
> >>> > but none of us has been willing to take the plunge. That being said,
> I'd
> >>> > be
> >>> > happy to help you make this happen! A lot of us want to see some kind
> of
> >>> > dependency management in Tracks, but the big issue is making it
> >>> > unobtrusive
> >>> > and a positive in light of GTD.
> >>> >
> >>> > -Eric
> >>> >
> >>> > On May 14, 2009, at 3:08 PM, Henrik Bohre wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> FYI: I'd like to inform you about some work being done to outline a
> >>> >> proposal for adding dependencies between actions.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> http://www.getontracks.org/wiki/ActionDependencies/
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I have taken the liberty to use
> >>> >> https://www.assembla.com/spaces/tracks-tickets/tickets/300 for
> >>> >> tracking the progress for this feature, and
> >>> >> https://www.assembla.com/spaces/tracks-tickets/tickets/903 for
> >>> >> tracking a GUI mockup.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> This is the feature I'd most like to see in future versions of
> Tracks,
> >>> >> so I urge all interested to hack away at the wiki page and the above
> >>> >> tickets to create an excellent implementation proposal.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Also, since I am new to the Tracks community I may not have all the
> >>> >> background info about what people have done earlier on this feature.
> >>> >> So please, let me know if I have missed something.
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Best regards,
> >>> >> /Henrik
> >>> >> _______________________________________________
> >>> >> Tracks-discuss mailing list
> >>> >> [email protected]
> >>> >> http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
> >>> >
> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >>> > Tracks-discuss mailing list
> >>> > [email protected]
> >>> > http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
> >>> >
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Tracks-discuss mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
> >>
> >>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Tracks-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
Tracks-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss

Reply via email to