On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Henrik Bohre<[email protected]> wrote: > I can see that there might be times that this could be handy but there > might be a danger in entering a great number of actions in a web > interface before saving them (see > https://www.assembla.com/spaces/tracks-tickets/tickets/907-Automatic-refresh-may-destroy-ongoing-edit), > or complexity in creating some kind of background save.
if your auto-refresh is set so quickly that you can't enter a list of bugs during that period... you have bigger issues. :) (That said, I've always though that was a bogus preference that should be dealt with by js polling for new bugs.) > My spontaneous reaction is that it may be better to streamline the > existing input form instead. The existing input form should definitely be streamlined, though admittedly I spent some time trying to think about that problem yesterday and came up with no good suggestions. But unless it auto-fills the previous action it is always going to be a pain to enter a long stream of dependent actions, which is why I suggested a separate page for that. Luis _______________________________________________ Tracks-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rousette.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/tracks-discuss
