Melinda,
yes, I am seeing the issue state changes. My concern is that they
often point to github postings. Sometimes I can comment on the
proposed change based on the terse text that may accompany the
issuer tracker message. In other cases one has to follow the
embedded link to see what has changed.
If the individual proposing changed text sent it to the list, I think
that would be
preferable, independent of the process change you noted about how/when
issues will be closed.
Steve
On 3/3/15 11:52 AM, Stephen Kent wrote:
Is there a good reason that the text for proposed resolution of
issues is not being sent via messages to this list, as is common IETF
practice? Someone who wants to track what is happening in trans
should be able to look at the mail and see what is being
changed/proposed, etc. Using github adds a layer of indirection that
is at best awkward, as noted above.
The resolutions are being sent to the mailing list, by the
issue tracker. You've raised some objections and discussed a
few others, so clearly the information associated with a ticket
state change is being communicated.
We've instituted a change, however, and that's that going forward,
issues will not be closed by document authors but by Paul and me.
Melinda
_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
