On 5 March 2015 at 21:31, Stephen Kent <[email protected]> wrote: > yes, that would be better than the current approach. >
OK, I will do that from now on. > > Steve > > > > On 5 March 2015 at 17:23, Stephen Kent <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Melinda, >> >> yes, I am seeing the issue state changes. My concern is that they >> often point to github postings. Sometimes I can comment on the >> proposed change based on the terse text that may accompany the >> issuer tracker message. In other cases one has to follow the >> embedded link to see what has changed. >> >> If the individual proposing changed text sent it to the list, I think >> that would be >> preferable, independent of the process change you noted about how/when >> issues will be closed. >> > > Would a diff included in the issue be sufficient? > > >
_______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
