Re: [Trans] [trans] #70 (rfc6962-bis): STH spec needs to define top-level extension syntax

Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:48:53 -0700

Yes, please do. I want to publish the proposed mechanism for signalling cert type 
and syntax checking status and that will rely on an SCT extension.

Thanks,

Steve


#70: STH spec needs to define top-level extension syntax

Changes (by [email protected]):

  * component:  client-behavior => rfc6962-bis




_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

Reply via email to