without a top-level format for SCT extensions, the current spec is
incomplete, i.e.,
it includes a named data structure with no spec for the content of the
structure.
I'll send some suggested text.
#70: STH spec needs to define top-level extension syntax
Comment ([email protected]):
It was our view that we did not need to specify the format until the first
extension was defined.
However, happy to consider proposed text.
_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
