Messages by Thread
-
-
[Trans] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis-13.txt
internet-drafts
-
[Trans] Putting illegal stuff in an append only ledger
Paul Wouters
-
[Trans] draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-28: "no security implications"
Andrew Ayer
-
[Trans] New Version Notification for draft-pwouters-powerbind-00.txt (fwd)
Paul Wouters
-
[Trans] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-28.txt
internet-drafts
-
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #130: Support Delegation of SCT Feedback/STH Pollination
trans issue tracker
-
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #146: SCT Feedback doesn't account for privacy-sensitive EE certs
trans issue tracker
-
[Trans] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-gossip-05.txt
internet-drafts
-
[Trans] Gossip ticket #146
Linus Nordberg
-
[Trans] Gossip ticket #130
Linus Nordberg
-
[Trans] Gossip ticket #103
Linus Nordberg
-
[Trans] Self Introduction
shafiq_aiman
-
[Trans] Section 4.2 follow-up
Eran Messeri
-
[Trans] FW: I-D Action: draft-hof-trans-cross-00.txt ([email protected])
Benjamin Hof
-
[Trans] Threat document update
Melinda Shore
-
[Trans] Short-term certificates side meeint
Yoav Nir
-
[Trans] Followup on draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-26.txt
Eric Rescorla
-
[Trans] Comments on draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis-12.txt
Eric Rescorla
-
[Trans] Slides, please
Melinda Shore
-
[Trans] Chainiac software update transparency work, presentations at CFRG and HRPC
Bryan Ford
-
[Trans] STAR & CT coexistence
Fossati, Thomas (Nokia - GB/Cambridge, UK)
-
[Trans] A paper on CT
Salz, Rich
-
[Trans] Request for feedback
Tadahiko Ito
-
[Trans] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-27.txt
internet-drafts
-
[Trans] A CT Research Paper
Harshal Sheth
-
[Trans] trans - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 100
"IETF Secretariat"
-
[Trans] AD Review: draft-ietf-trans-gossip-04
Eric Rescorla
-
[Trans] Fwd: IETF 100 Preliminary Agenda
Melinda Shore
-
[Trans] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-threat-analysis-12.txt
internet-drafts
-
[Trans] AD Review: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-26.txt
Eric Rescorla
-
[Trans] Can logs return SCTs that correspond to Precerts in response to add-chain?
Tom Ritter
-
[Trans] trans - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 100
IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
-
[Trans] Future work
Melinda Shore
-
[Trans] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-26.txt
internet-drafts
-
[Trans] draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis completed working group last call
Melinda Shore
-
[Trans] Draft minutes for IETF 99 meeting
Salz, Rich
-
[Trans] Reminder, wglc for 6962-bis
Melinda Shore
-
[Trans] Distributed Internet Infrastructure side meeting on Monday
Melinda Shore
-
[Trans] Working group last call, draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis
Melinda Shore
-
[Trans] I-D Action: draft-ietf-trans-rfc6962-bis-25.txt
internet-drafts
-
[Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] Batch modify: #79, #162, #190, #184
trans issue tracker
-
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #184: Remove unnecessary restrictions on clients
trans issue tracker
-
[Trans] trans - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 99
"IETF Secretariat"
-
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #79: Precertificate signature must be over something other than just the TBSCertificate
trans issue tracker
-
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #177: Instructions for constructing leaf hash from cert + SCT
trans issue tracker
-
[Trans] Mutability of Certificate Signatures
Andrew Ayer
-
[Trans] Fwd: Side meetings experiment at IETF 99
Melinda Shore
-
Re: [Trans] Write-up of the "Strict CT" variant
Ryan Sleevi
-
Re: [Trans] Removal of the use of digitally-signed (issue #174)
Salz, Rich
-
[Trans] Reminder: we'd like to get into wg last call
Melinda Shore
-
[Trans] Drop RSA PKCS#1 1.5 signatures; maybe replace with RSA PSS
Brian Smith
-
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #178: Add description of how to validate an SCT
trans issue tracker
-
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #176: Remove `X509ChainEntry` and `PrecertChainEntryV2`
trans issue tracker
-
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #164: Incorporate new protocol mechanisms into TLS Client section
trans issue tracker
-
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #175: Clarify guarantees around MMD, STH age
trans issue tracker
-
[Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #190: Simplify data structures in 6962-bis
trans issue tracker
-
[Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #189: Permit logs to use EdDSA
trans issue tracker
-
[Trans] Ticket 170
Melinda Shore
-
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #167: Define "incorporate"
trans issue tracker
-
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #170: Allow for separate SCT and STH keys?
trans issue tracker
-
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #186: Add a registry for error codes
trans issue tracker
-
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #166: State the log parameters in the section that defines a log
trans issue tracker
-
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #183: Don't violate the TLS Feature extension definition
trans issue tracker
-
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #172: Pick one structure for multiple TransItems
trans issue tracker
-
Re: [Trans] [Public Notary Transparency Wiki] #173: De-duplicate Extension types
trans issue tracker
-
[Trans] The RFC6979 requirement in RFC6962-bis is bad
Brian Smith