#70: STH spec needs to define top-level extension syntax

Comment (by [email protected]):

 It was our view that we did not need to specify the format until the first
 extension was defined.

 However, happy to consider proposed text.

-- 
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:               |       Owner:  draft-ietf-trans-
  [email protected]           |  [email protected]
     Type:  defect       |      Status:  new
 Priority:  major        |   Milestone:
Component:  rfc6962-bis  |     Version:
 Severity:  -            |  Resolution:
 Keywords:               |
-------------------------+-------------------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/70#comment:2>
trans <http://tools.ietf.org/trans/>

_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

Reply via email to