#83: CT should mandate the use of deterministic ECDSA Changes (by [email protected]):
* owner: [email protected] => [email protected] * status: reopened => new * milestone: milestone1 => review Comment: About RSA: The v1.5 signature scheme (currently required in -bis) is deterministic. The new one (RSASSA-PSS) is not, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PKCS_1 Seems like this ticket can be closed as fixed. -- -----------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Reporter: [email protected] | Owner: [email protected] Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: review Component: rfc6962-bis | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: Keywords: | -----------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/83#comment:9> trans <http://tools.ietf.org/trans/> _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
