#83: CT should mandate the use of deterministic ECDSA
Comment (by [email protected]): The revised draft doesn't mention that this explicitly precludes RSASSA- PSS. Do we want that stated explicitly? Also, we probably want to add more than one signature over a single timestamp to the list of things that a monitor or auditor should look for as evidence of log malfeasance (though i'm not sure whether this list belongs in 6962-bis or elsewhere. -- -----------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Reporter: [email protected] | Owner: [email protected] Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: review Component: rfc6962-bis | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: Keywords: | -----------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/83#comment:14> trans <https://tools.ietf.org/trans/> _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
