#83: CT should mandate the use of deterministic ECDSA
Comment (by [email protected]): Should we add some text to the Security Considerations section to explain _why_ we need to use deterministic signature schemes? If we don't, then in a few years from now somebody might say "Hey, let's upgrade CT to use RSASSA-PSS 'cos it's newer". -- -----------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Reporter: [email protected] | Owner: [email protected] Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: review Component: rfc6962-bis | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: Keywords: | -----------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/83#comment:10> trans <http://tools.ietf.org/trans/> _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
