#83: CT should mandate the use of deterministic ECDSA

Comment (by [email protected]):

 Should we add some text to the Security Considerations section to explain
 _why_ we need to use deterministic signature schemes?

 If we don't, then in a few years from now somebody might say "Hey, let's
 upgrade CT to use RSASSA-PSS 'cos it's newer".

-- 
-----------------------------------+--------------------------------------
 Reporter:  [email protected]  |       Owner:  [email protected]
     Type:  defect                 |      Status:  new
 Priority:  major                  |   Milestone:  review
Component:  rfc6962-bis            |     Version:
 Severity:  -                      |  Resolution:
 Keywords:                         |
-----------------------------------+--------------------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/83#comment:10>
trans <http://tools.ietf.org/trans/>

_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

Reply via email to