On 11/01/16 17:31, Karen Seo wrote:
Folks,
I agree with the approach discussed on the list of simplifying 6962-bis to
focus only on specifications for the CT log by moving the detailed
specifications for other components of the CT system to other documents.
<snip>
/[The rest of 3.2 defines both what the log should accept for a
pre-certificate and what the CA must do. So it should remain here
but also be duplicated in a requirements document for CAs. ]/**
I don't see how duplicating text in multiple documents helps the goal of
"simplifying".
BTW, keeping "the rest of 3.2" would mean keeping section 3.2's
reference to section 4.2, but...
<snip>
/*Sections 4.1 Wildcard Certificates, 4.2 */***/Redacting Domain Name
Labels in Precertificates, and /*/*4.3 Using a Name-Constrained
Intermediate CA*/**
**
/[The text in these sections applies only to CAs and should be moved
to a requirements specification for CAs]/
...you're proposing to move section 4.2 to another document, which would
be written later.
For -10 of 6962-bis, I spent many hours moving text around so that each
component of the CT system has its own section in that document, rather
than all of the requirements for all of the components being mixed up.
I think that had the effect of "simplifying 6962-bis", and I don't think
that any further "simplifying" work is necessary.
IMHO, the idea of splitting 6962-bis into a separate doc for each
component just seems like unnecessary editorial work.
<snip>
--
Rob Stradling
Senior Research & Development Scientist
COMODO - Creating Trust Online
_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
