#156: Can inclusion proofs properly substitute SCTs?
Comment (by [email protected]): A proposed solution is out for review in https://github.com/google /certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/142. -- -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: | Owner: draft-ietf-trans- [email protected] | [email protected] Type: defect | Status: new Priority: critical | Milestone: Component: rfc6962-bis | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/156#comment:5> trans <https://tools.ietf.org/trans/> _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
