#156: Can inclusion proofs properly substitute SCTs? Changes (by [email protected]):
* status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed -- ------------------------------+--------------------------------------- Reporter: [email protected] | Owner: [email protected] Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: critical | Milestone: review Component: rfc6962-bis | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: fixed Keywords: | ------------------------------+--------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/156#comment:9> trans <https://tools.ietf.org/trans/> _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
