#156: Can inclusion proofs properly substitute SCTs? Changes (by [email protected]):
* owner: [email protected] => [email protected] Comment: PR 142 mentioned above was merged. Re-assigning to Rob for him to add the mentioned data structure. -- ------------------------------+--------------------------------------- Reporter: [email protected] | Owner: [email protected] Type: defect | Status: new Priority: critical | Milestone: Component: rfc6962-bis | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: Keywords: | ------------------------------+--------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/156#comment:6> trans <https://tools.ietf.org/trans/> _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
