#156: Can inclusion proofs properly substitute SCTs?
Comment (by [email protected]): Out for review in https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency- rfcs/pull/148, based on Rob's changes and addressing Ben's review comments. -- ------------------------------+--------------------------------------- Reporter: [email protected] | Owner: [email protected] Type: defect | Status: new Priority: critical | Milestone: Component: rfc6962-bis | Version: Severity: - | Resolution: Keywords: | ------------------------------+--------------------------------------- Ticket URL: <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/trans/trac/ticket/156#comment:7> trans <https://tools.ietf.org/trans/> _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
