> That is what we are doing now?
Better late than never. The PR is five days old. When did the discussions
happen? Why did they not happen on the WG mailing list? You can consider those
rhetorical questions.
> The idea would be that the 6962 experiment is phased out for the 6962bis
experiment.
Yes, I know.
> We should withdraw this document from any publication stream. What is
the point of publishing it?
> The idea is to see implementations, confirm proper functioning and
then (maybe with some minor changes that we learned from running the
experiment) publish this as Proposed Standard.
Do you have any indication that anyone else is looking at deploying this? I
mean "experiment" is a pretty weak enticement, especially compared to a
proposed Internet standard. I believe there will be no experiments deployed.
From everything I've seen, the community is focused only on 6962.
> However, withdrawing the publication would leave 6962 as the only
kind of CT log server, and we would miss all the improvements that
we worked on for years with 6962bis ?
Yes, it is frustrating to see so much effort wasted. But I truly believe it's
the honest thing to conclude. Has anyone from any log made any pubic
commitment to deploy the next experiment?
_______________________________________________
Trans mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
