On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 10:54:55 -0700 Ben Laurie <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 at 18:07, Andrew Ayer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:46:18 -0700 > > Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I am not arguing for removal, but I don't think it's appropriate > > > to have a recommendation which precludes the use of the mode of > > > RSA that we are otherwise telling people to use. > > > > Thanks for clarifying what your concern is. > > > > The recommendation doesn't preclude the use of RSA-PSS, or any other > > nondeterministic signature scheme. As reflected in the text, logs > > can satisfy the recommendation by signing a particular STH/SCT only > > once and storing the signature, instead of signing on demand. > > > > That can't be a hard requirement without impacting availability, FWIW. Is that true of both STHs and SCTs, or just SCTs? Regards, Andrew _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
