I am not arguing for removal, but I don't think it's appropriate to have a recommendation which precludes the use of the mode of RSA that we are otherwise telling people to use.
-Ekr On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Andrew Ayer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 13:13:42 -0400 (EDT) > Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 3. AD revieW: Remove the Preventing Tracking Clients claim > > > > https://github.com/google/certificate-transparency-rfcs/pull/295 > > > > We had some discussion on the list. Eric has pointed out this > > complicated RSA-PSS. Previous discussion talked about removing > > this as it was mostly to faciliate the (still incomplete) gossip > > protocol. We can either leave it in, remove it, or rewrite it to > > more advisory/BCP and less restrictive ? Please dicsuss, otherwise > > it seems to consensus is to remove this claim. > > Why do you think the consensus is to remove? During the mailing list > discussion, Linus Nordberg, Tom Ritter, and I all spoke up in favor of > keeping it. No one spoke in favor of removal. > > Regards, > Andrew > > _______________________________________________ > Trans mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans >
_______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
