I believe your payer is incorrect.  'Not used' would mean just that, unless
DHHS converted it to a used field in a future addendum or update.
Your payer client needs to understand that this is a national standard -
not his company's private application.
I work for a payer too and I can assure you that your client will not be in
compliance if he requires use of a 'not used' field.



                                                                                       
                            
                    Janie Miller                                                       
                            
                    <Janie.Miller        To:     "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                 
                    @QCSI.com>           cc:                                           
                            
                                         Subject:     RE: req vs. situation - 
companion documents                  
                    07/11/2002                                                         
                            
                    03:39 PM                                                           
                            
                    Please                                                             
                            
                    respond to                                                         
                            
                    transactions                                                       
                            
                                                                                       
                            
                                                                                       
                            




I work for a vendor providing payer solutions.  One of our clients has
stipulated this as one of their business requirements within an 834.  I
just
wanted to be sure to understand the legal side of it.

-----Original Message-----
From: David Frenkel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 3:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: req vs. situation - companion documents


Janie,
You don't have to mention names but has somebody asked you use 'NOT
Used' fields?

Regards,

David Frenkel
Business Development
GEFEG USA
Global Leader in Ecommerce Tools
www.gefeg.com
425-260-5030

-----Original Message-----
From: Janie Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 1:02 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: req vs. situation - companion documents

Probably ignorant questions, but I must clarify for my own sanity:

In a companion document, is it HIPAA compliant for a covered entity to
"require" certain "situational" loops/segments/data elements of its
trading
partner(s)?  What about when the covered entity wants to "require"
certain
specific data in "NOT USED" description fields?



**********************************************************************
To be removed from this list, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request.

======================================================
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated.
The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the
individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of
the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP.  If you wish to receive an
official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at
http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.
Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is
specifically prohibited.



**********************************************************************
To be removed from this list, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request.

======================================================
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated.  The
discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the
individual
participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board
of Directors nor WEDI SNIP.  If you wish to receive an official opinion,
post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at
http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.
Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is
specifically prohibited.


**********************************************************************
To be removed from this list, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request.

======================================================
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated.  The
discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the
individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the
WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP.  If you wish to receive an official
opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at
http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.
Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is
specifically prohibited.







**********************************************************************
To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request.

======================================================
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated.  The discussions 
on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do 
not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP.  If 
you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues 
Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.
Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is specifically 
prohibited.

Reply via email to