X12 does not define a syntax condition between DTP02 & DTP03 and nor does the X12N Implementation Guides either in the form of a specific notation such as (DTP03 must exist if DTP02 exists). This means that from a syntax perspective (as defined in the IG) that the following passes: DTP*307*D8~ (vs DTP*307*D8*20020922~).. but of course it is invalid. I would prefer to report this on a 997 but fear that it would not be valid... thoughts?
********************************************************************** To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request. ===================================================== The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is specifically prohibited.
