Robbi,
A missing DTP03 value is an X12 syntax error as all three elements are required by the
X12 standard.
Stuart Beaton
Vice President
Washington Publishing Company
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----
From: Robbi McClane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mon 9/23/2002 11:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Missing DTP03 value in transactions...
X12 does not define a syntax condition between DTP02 & DTP03 and nor does the
X12N Implementation Guides either in the form of a specific notation such as (DTP03
must exist if DTP02 exists). This means that from a syntax perspective (as defined in
the IG) that the following passes: DTP*307*D8~ (vs DTP*307*D8*20020922~).. but of
course it is invalid. I would prefer to report this on a 997 but fear that it would
not be valid... thoughts?
**********************************************************************
To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request.
==================
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The
discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual
participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of
Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post
your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at
http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/.
Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is
specifically prohibited.
���zj/y��ka��b�� �֦z���h�+-��{����>W�����ajح���jG���;�.��h�� z�2���z�����ya!#H>X��ǫ��0�'!ʋ���.n�+������j z��y��yجr�,���{a��b�� ��az�����z�ޱ������,��az)݊����ij�br*Z����h��gyǬ���*ަ��z{m���{ (~�^X@���v�Ê����잊�24��*.�+!���q�y��}����h�)�zh�ܨ���z�b�{h��24�Ȳ˞�6�i��y�a������������rH����ا���v���+ �������r��z�"j[�z��+%��lz���^r'�q�eʚ�&��
<<winmail.dat>>
