I was trying to over complicate things, I think, by trying to work out how I was going to model via inheritance (and "ISA") the role to person relationship. Ie. I was going on the premise of the Engineer ISA user.
Makes it that little bit simpler (for me in this case) when I realised that a user "HASA" role. Thanks to everyone! Gavin. On Nov 11, 8:57 am, "Mark Mandel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I assume, now, that the object declaration (in the XML and the TO > > creation too) in this case is redundant, since I am only needing to > > be able to manage the setting/getting of the issuetype id for each > > ticket - which is created within the CAR object via the manytoone > > relationship? > > > Gavin. > > If I read this right, I think you have got it worked out. > > You have your object, which is assigned a role... the role is really > just a manytoone relationship. > > (You are actually using Composition over Inheritance, which is a good thing) > > Mark > > > > -- > E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > W:www.compoundtheory.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
