You could use decorator="path.to.baseDecorator". :) Paul
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Matt Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes that is what I have now. But what I want is the ability to have a > global decorator without creating a decorator for my transfer object. > > Example I have a widget that does not need a decorator other then what > is in the base decorator. > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Matt Quackenbush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Create a BaseTransferObjectDecorator that extends > > transfer.com.TransferDecorator. Then have your decorator extend > > BaseTransferObjectDecorator. > > > > HTH > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Paul Marcotte Fancy Bread - in the heart or in the head? http://www.fancybread.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
