Just being lazy. :) On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Chris Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > why in the world would you want that? I mean, for real, you *could* add > functions inside the transfer decorator object itself (you shouldnt do > this), but whats the deal here? Just make each one of your objects have a > decorator, and dont put anything into it if you dont want, and have all > those blank decorators extend your base decorator, and you will be all set. > What you got against a decorator file? =) > > Chris > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Matt Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> that is what I thought. >> >> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Matt Quackenbush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Matt Graf wrote: >> >> >> >> I don't think I am explaining myself very well lets see if I can >> >> explain it a little better >> >> >> >> Here is an example of where I tell transfer to use my decorator >> >> <object name="widget_one" table="widget_one" >> >> decorator="model.decorators.widget_one"> >> >> >> >> now what I want is for transfer to use my base decorator without >> >> telling transfer to do so. >> >> >> >> is that possible? >> > >> > >> > No. >> > >> > > >> > >> >> > > > > -- > Hey! I dont tell you how to tell me what to do, so dont tell me how to do > what you tell me to do! ~ Bender (Futurama) > > > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to transfer-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
