why in the world would you want that? I mean, for real, you *could* add functions inside the transfer decorator object itself (you shouldnt do this), but whats the deal here? Just make each one of your objects have a decorator, and dont put anything into it if you dont want, and have all those blank decorators extend your base decorator, and you will be all set. What you got against a decorator file? =)
Chris On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Matt Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > that is what I thought. > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Matt Quackenbush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Matt Graf wrote: > >> > >> I don't think I am explaining myself very well lets see if I can > >> explain it a little better > >> > >> Here is an example of where I tell transfer to use my decorator > >> <object name="widget_one" table="widget_one" > >> decorator="model.decorators.widget_one"> > >> > >> now what I want is for transfer to use my base decorator without > >> telling transfer to do so. > >> > >> is that possible? > > > > > > No. > > > > > > > > > > > -- Hey! I dont tell you how to tell me what to do, so dont tell me how to do what you tell me to do! ~ Bender (Futurama) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
