Hello, > The work that Debian is doing on SoC is probably the right long term > approach to engaging offline editors with Pootle. > > Although I'd still love to see poEdit talking to Pootle in the short > term. It would have saved me a lot of time and effort.
I am working on this and if you could outline the kind of interface that poEdit needs the server to provide, I could probably provide a working server implementation in a week or so. Is that short-term enough? ;) What kind of transport protocol would be preferred? Would XML-RPC be acceptable? I don't want to dig into the implementation details of poEdit, having enough work on Pootle already. Maybe someone else would volunteer to work on the client side? -- Gintautas Miliauskas http://gintasm.blogspot.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________ Translate-pootle mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle
